SỐ 06THÁNG 6 NĂM 2018 Tạ p chi Kinh tê và Quả n trị Kinh doanh Journal of Economics and Business Administration TRƯ Ờ NG ĐẠ I HỌ C KINH TẾ VÀ QUẢ N TRỊ KINH DOANH - ĐẠ I HỌ C THÁI NGUYÊN THAI NGUYEN UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES -TUEBA NO.6, 2018 ISSN: 2525 ■2569 Chuyên mục: Thông tin & Trao đổi - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) Tạp chí Kinh tế và Quản trị Kinh doanh Journal of Economics and Business Administration Chỉ số ISSN: 2525 – 2569 MỤC LỤC Số 06, tháng 06 năm 2018 Chuyên mục: THÔNG TIN & TRAO ĐỔI Âu Thị Diệu Linh - Chế độ hưu trí - Một số hạn chế và hướng hoàn thiện .............................................. 2 Phạm Hồng Trƣờng - Mô hình toán học trong việc phân chia công bằng theo tỷ lệ................................ 7 Nguyễn Thị Phƣơng Hảo - Hiện trạng bình đẳng giới trong việc làm, thu nhập và mức sống ở Việt Nam........................................................................................................................................................... 11 Nguyễn Tiến Long, Nguyễn Thị Thùy Dung - Thực trạng việc làm của lao động nữ ở Việt Nam hiện nay............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Chuyên mục: KINH TẾ & QUẢN LÝ Đỗ Quang Quý, Đồng Văn Tuấn, Nguyễn Thị Mai Xuân - Lựa chọn cơ cấu cây trồng để nâng cao hiệu quả sử dụng đất trong kinh tế nông hộ .............................................................................................. 24 Hoàng Thị Lệ Mỹ - Pháp luật phòng chống gian lận trong bảo hiểm thương mại – Một số bất cập và giải pháp.................................................................................................................................................... 27 Nguyễn Phƣơng Đại, Nguyễn Tiên Phong, Đỗ Đức Quang, Trần Huy Ngọc - Tạo việc làm cho lao động dân tộc thiểu số qua các hoạt động phát triển kinh tế tại xã Quốc Khánh, huyện Tràng Định, tỉnh Lạng Sơn ................................................................................................................................................... 32 Trần Quang Huy, Nguyễn Đắc Dũng, Phạm Thị Vân Khánh - Chính sách hỗ trợ phát triển sản xuất kinh doanh cho các hộ nông dân trên địa bàn tỉnh Thái Nguyên và đánh giá của các nhà quản lý .......... 40 Chuyên mục: QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH & MARKETING Nguyễn Thị Hồng Nhung, Trần Văn Dũng, Trần Văn Quyết - Giải pháp t ng cường thu h t vốn đ u tư vào các khu công nghiệp tỉnh Hà Giang ............................................................................................... 47 Trần Văn Quyết, Phạm Minh Hƣơng, Phạm Công Toàn - Thông tin và hành vi của các nhà đ u tư vào các tỉnh khu vực biên giới phía c: Nghiên cứu điển hình tại tỉnh Lào Cai .................................... 53 Trần Trung Vỹ, Nguyễn Xuân Quỳnh, Eriberto Casino - Đánh giá chất lượng dịch vụ du lịch ở vịnh Hạ Long tỉnh Quảng Ninh......................................................................................................................... 60 Trần Việt Đức, Vũ Xuân Thôn, Nguyễn Phan Thiết - Mô hình đề xuất về n ng lực cạnh tranh ngành sản xuất đồ gỗ Việt Nam........................................................................................................................... 71 Chuyên mục: TÀI CHÍNH - NGÂN HÀNG Tạ Thúy Hằng, Dƣơng Thanh Tình, Mai Thanh Giang - Quản lý rủi ro tín dụng định hướng theo tiêu chuẩn ASEL II tại Ngân Hàng Thương Mại Cổ Ph n Quốc Tế Việt Nam - Chi nhánh Thái Nguyên .. 80 Nguyễn Văn Huân, Đỗ Năng Thắng - Mô hình cảnh báo rủi ro tín dụng khách hàng cá nhân cho các ngân hàng thương mại Việt Nam .............................................................................................................. 86 Thái Thị Thu Trang, Hoàng Mỹ Bình - Nâng cao hiệu quả hoạt động của ngành thuế Thái Nguyên theo hướng điện tử hóa ............................................................................................................................. 93 Journal of Economics and Business Administration - TUEBA ISSN: 2525 – 2569 No. 6, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Au Thi Diêu Linh - Pension regime - Some restrictions and directions for completion .......................... 2 Pham Hong Truong - Mathematic model in proportional fair division .................................................... 7 Nguyen Thi Phuong Hao - Gender equality in jobs, income and living standards in Viet Nam ............ 11 Nguyen Tien Long, Nguyen Thị Thuy Dung - The curent status of employment for female labor in Viet Nam ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Đo Quang Quy, Đong Van Tuan, Nguyen Thi Mai Xuan - Selection of crops structure to enhance the efficiency of land use for farmers ............................................................................................................. 24 Hoang Thi Le My - Law on anti – Fraud commercial insurance – Some shortcomings and solutions... 27 Nguyen Phuong Dai, Nguyen Tien Phong, Do Duc Quang, Trần Huy Ngoc - Creating employment for ethnic group labor through economic development activities in Quoc Khanh commune, Trang Dinh district, Lang Son province ....................................................................................................................... 32 Tran Quang Huy, Nguyen Dac Dung, Pham Thi Van Khanh - Support policies to production and business development for famers in Thai Nguyen province and manager’s evaluation ........................... 40 Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung, Tran Van Dung, Tran Van Quyet - Solutions to increase investment capital to industrial zones of Ha Giang province ...................................................................................... 47 Tran Van Quyet, Pham Minh Huong, Pham Cong Toan - Investors’ behaviour in northern frontier provinces: An empirical study in Lao Cai province ................................................................................. 53 Tran Trung Vy, Nguyen Xuan Quynh, Eriberto Casino - An assessment of the quality of tourism services in Ha Long Bay of Quang Ninh province ................................................................................... 60 Tran Viet Đuc, Vu Xuan Thon, Nguyen Phan Thiet - Proposal model of competitiveness for Viet Nam timber industry sector ....................................................................................................................... 71 Ta Thuy Hang, Duong Thanh Tinh, Mai Thanh Giang - Credit risk manangement towards Basell II standard in Viet Nam international commercial joint stock bank – Thai Nguyen branch ....................... 80 Nguyen Van Huan, Do Nang Thang - Models of credit risk warning for individual customer for commercial banks in Viet Nam................................................................................................................. 86 Thai Thi Thu Trang, Hoang My Binh - Enhancing the performance of local tax services in Thai Nguyen province by using e-tax ............................................................................................................... 93 100 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) MÔ HÌNH ĐỀ XUẤT VỀ N NG LỰC CẠNH TRANH NGÀNH SẢN XUẤT ĐỒ GỖ VIỆT NAM Trần Việt Đức1, Vũ Xuân Thôn2, Nguyễn Phan Thiết3, Tóm tắt Khả năng cạnh tranh của các doanh nghiệp ch bi n gỗ là một trong những giải pháp quan trọng nhưng Việt Nam vẫn chưa có nhiều nghiên cứu sâu h n về v n đề này, nên nghiên cứu "Đề xu t mô hình đánh giá năng lực cạnh tranh của các doanh nghiệp sản xu t đồ gỗ Việt Nam" góp phần nâng cao sức cạnh tranh của các doanh nghiệp đồ gỗ Việt Nam Tr n c s đó, li n hệ với ngành sản xu t gỗ thì mô hình đề xu t có thể áp d ng giải quy t v n đề năng lực cạnh tranh trong ngành này. Bài vi t xác định các nhân t thực t tác động tới năng lực cạnh tranh và há năng cạnh tranh của các doanh nghiệp sản xu t đồ gỗ tại Việt Nam Đưa ra một s giải pháp xây dựng năng lực mà từ đó giúp các doanh nghiệp trong ngành có thể áp d ng để giải quy t v n đề về cạnh tranh. Từ khóa: Sự cạnh tranh, ngành sản xu t đồ gỗ Việt Nam, Doanh nghiệp ch bi n đồ gỗ mô hình năng lực cạnh tranh, các nhân t ảnh hư ng. PROPOSAL MODEL OF COMPETITIVENESS FOR VIETNAM TIMBER INDUSTRY SECTOR Abstract The competitiveness of wood processing enterprises is one of the important solutions, but in Vietnam there are not many research in depth on this issue. Therefore, the study "Proposal Model of Competitiveness for Timber Industry Sector" (VTIS) is to identify the factors that really affect the competitiveness and competitiveness of Vietnamese timber enterprises. Based on this, related to timber business sector the proposal model can be applied to solve the problems of competitiveness of their enterprises. This paper is to identify the factors that really affect the competitiveness and competitiveness of Vietnamese timber industry enterprises. A number of capacity building solutions, on which related to the businesses can apply to solve the problems of competitiveness of their businesses. Keywords: Competitiveness, Vietnam Timber Industry Sector, Timber Industry Enterprises, Competitiveness Model, determinants. Vietnamese timber industry sector has not been 1. Introduction studied; it is difficult to apply research into the Competitiveness of the enterprises are the competitiveness of other industries in the timber ability to combine resources of these firms to processing firms because they have different create competitive advantage, in other words, characteristics. Therefore, this study will answer competitiveness of a company is the ability to those questions: What are factors really affected maintain, deploy and coordinate resources and on competitiveness? What is current status of capabilities. In that way helps the companies competitiveness of wood processing industry in achieve their goals "(Sanchez & Heene, 1996, Vietnam? Is there any solution to rise? This 2004). Therefore, competitiveness is always a study will answer those questions. This paper is top concern of the company, managers, and come up with propose a model of researchers. There have been many studies on the competitiveness for timber industry sector competitiveness of enterprises have been made (enterprises) in Vietnam. all over the world. 2. Methodology Over the years, Vietnam timber industry The study uses data collected through sector has made great progress in terms of interviews with knowledgeable, skilled and quality, quantity, and export turnover. Export knowledgeable people on the competitiveness, as turnover growth of wood products reached more well as on the woodworking sector in the training than 10%/year. In 2016, the export turnover institutions, research and management. reached more than 6.9 billion US dollars and - Sample: Provinces will be surveyed: Vietnam timber industry has risen to No. 1 in Furniture enterprises in Binhdinh, Dongnai and Southeast Asia. However, the competitiveness of 71 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) Binhduong provinces account for more than 90% of furniture enterprises in the whole country. Therefore, surveyed enterprises are selected in these three provinces (Development strategy of Forestry 2015-2030). The data analysis method used for this study is an analytical method based on the model of exploratory factor analysis. In order to achieve reliable estimation of this method, the sample N0 1 2 3 must be of sufficient size. Based on the experiences of Hair & Associates (2010) (The Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, Anderson, RE, (2010). The minimum sample size for the model of exploratory factor analysis is at least 5 observations (preferably 10 observations or more) for an estimation parameter. Number of surveyed Furniture enterprises. Table 1: Number of surveyed Furniture enterprisesin the 3 provinces Province Total furniture enterprises Number of selected FEs Dong Nai 365 15 Binh Duong 810 25 Binh Dinh 64 10 Total 1239 50 Source. Calculated by author from survey data. Thus, the theoretical model has 24 parameters to estimate, so the minimum sample size required for formal study is 120 (24 x 5) observations. To gain this sample size, 150 questionnaires/interviews were conducted and collected 150 questionnaires. For example, selected FEs is an establishing a proposal theoretical model of competitiveness of Vietnam timber industry enterprises (VTIs) includes: in Vietnam National University of Forestry (VNUF) 5 people; in Vietnam Administration of Forestry (VIFOREST) 5 people; in Vietnam Associate of Forestry Science and Technique (VAFST) 5 people; and total questionnaires/interviews distributed 15. Sampling technique - Survey sample was selected by random method, stratified in combination with the following criteria: + For wood furniture production enterprises: * Medium / small scale * Producing interior and exterior furniture * Mainly exported products + For the interviewee or questionnaire, there are 3 types of person selected as follow: Chief of executive officer (CEO), head of department (HoD) and foreman (FM). - Questionnaires will be formulated in 7 indicators of competitiveness (base on Porter’s formulation they will be modified depending on actual conditions of Vietnam) - Questionnaire: The surveys questionnaire will be sent to wooden furniture companies in the provinces Vietnam. Before sending the questionnaire to the potential firms, the author asked some advices from supervisor and some fellows to make sure that the questions were 72 clear and easy to understand. The questionnaires were conducted in forms of online survey (emails) and telephone survey. - Answer and question survey: The author will directly gives questions for questioned peoples and get their answers Field survey: The author will go to selected companies to gather documents and data. Data processing methods - Descriptive statistics method - Analytical methodology for exploring the EFA - SWOT analysis method - Professional solution 3. Results and disscusion 3.1. Identify the groups of factors that really affect the competitiveness of VTIS The company's competitiveness is reflected in the assessment of overall competitiveness and the composition groups/the influence to its overall competitiveness based on the use of the five-level Likert scale. Competitiveness of firms is analyzed based on Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). 3.2. Quality testing of the scale by Cronbach Alpha Coefficient The scale and reliability of the observed variables were estimated using the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and the Exploratory factor Analysis. The requirement for a scale to be accepted is to eliminate variables with a corrected item – total correlation of less than 0.3 and a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of less than 0.6. Furthermore, in EFA, factors with factor loading of less than 0.5 are excluded from the scale because of a poor correlation with the underlying factors (measurement concept). The final step is to test the model by using a multivariate regression with a statistically significant 5%. Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) Table 2: Summary of results of quality analysis of the scale By Cronbach Alpha coefficient Number of Number of Eliminated Cronbach No Group of variables remaining variables variable Alpha variables Ability of Organization and 1 4 0 4 0,789 Enterprise management (E) 2 Employment qualification (L) 4 L22 3 0,612 3 Machine and Technology (M) 3 0 3 0,680 4 Product quality and package (Q) 2 Q41; Q42 0 0,502 5 R & D capacity (R) 3 0 3 0,763 6 Finance position (F) 3 0 3 0,832 7 Infrastructure (I) 5 I71 4 0,834 Source: Calculated by author from survey data. Cronbach alpha coefficient = 0.502 <0.6, so this The quality testing of scale in Table 2 show that: group is eliminated from the model. - Variables L22, Q41, Q42, and I71 have Thus, the scale system is built with six-level correlation coefficients comparing to corrected scale is good quality assurance with 20 item – Total correlation of less than 0.3, so these characteristic variables. variables are eliminated from the model. - Cronbach Alpha coefficients of the 3.3. The Results of Exploratory Factor Analysis – EFA population are greater than 0.6 except that the - Testing the suitability of the EFA "Quality of Product Q" factor group has Table 3: Testing KMO and artlett’s Test 0,906 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy Approx. Chi-Square 1177,816 Barlett’s Test of df 120 Sphericity Sig. 0,000 Source. Calculated by author from survey data. - Correlation verifying of observed variables - Testing the explanation level of the observed in the representative metric: Table 3 shows that the variables for the factor: The column Cumulative of Bartlett test has significance degree Sig.<0.05, so Table 4. shows that the deviation value is 67.98%, that the observed variables are linearly correlated which means that 67.98% of the change of factors with the representative factor. is explained by the observed variables. Table 4: The Total Variance Explained Extraction Sums of Squared Rotation Sums of Squared Initial Eigenvalues Loadings Loadings Component % of Cumulative % of Cumulative % of Cumulative Total Total Total Variance % Variance % Variance % 1 6,753 42,208 42,208 6,753 42,208 42,208 4,305 26,908 26,908 2 2,024 12,650 54,858 2,024 12,650 54,858 2,784 17,401 44,308 3 1,078 6,738 61,596 1,078 6,738 61,596 2,075 12,969 57,277 4 1,021 6,382 67,978 1,021 6,382 67,978 1,712 10,700 67,978 5 ,701 4,384 72,362 6 ,672 4,197 76,559 7 ,566 3,537 80,096 8 ,541 3,381 83,477 9 ,435 2,719 86,196 10 ,426 2,663 88,859 11 ,362 2,261 91,121 12 ,318 1,989 93,109 13 ,312 1,948 95,057 14 ,291 1,820 96,877 15 ,255 1,596 98,473 16 ,244 1,527 100,000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Source: Calculated by author from survey data. 73 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) the overall competitiveness and one scale - The result of the model representing the overall competitiveness (TC) Through the quality testing of the scale and (see Table 5). of the EFA modeling, the validation of that there are 4 scales representing the factors affecting to Table 5: Adjustment model after testing Crobach Alpha and Exploratory factor analysis No Scales Characteristic variables Explaination of the scale F61, F62, F63, I73, I75, 1 F (F1) Finance Position (F6) M31, M32 Ability of Organization and Enterprise 2 E (F2) E11, E13, E14, L23 management (E1) 3 I (F3) I72, I74, L21 Infrastructure (I7) 4 R (F4) R52, R53 R & D capacity (R5) 5 NLCTC TC Overall Competitiveness (TC) Source: Calculated by author from survey data The consideration of the factors from F1 to F4, which directly really affect to the competitiveness of the enterprise will be achieved by the linear regression equation: TC = β0+β1F1 + β2F2 + β3F3 + β4F4 Where, the variables included in the regression analysis are determined by calculating the factor score. Table 6: Model Summary - Multivariate regression analysis To identify the factors that affect to competitiveness, the overall correlation pattern is: TC = f (F1, F2, F3, F4) Where: TC: Dependent variable; F1, F2, F3, F4: Independent variables. Independent variables Regression coefficient is not standardized (B) (Constant) 2,787 F1 F2 F3 F4 Total ,288 ,360 ,136 ,065 Value t Level of statistical significance (Sig.) VIF 63,350 ,000 1,000 ,000 ,000 ,002 ,145 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 *** 6,526 8,163*** 3,082** 1,466NS Standardized regression coefficient (Beta) Absolute value of Beta Contribution degree of variables (%) Important degree of variables ,400 33,90 2 ,501 42,46 1 ,189 16,02 3 ,090 7,63 1,18 100,0 Independent variables : TC – Overall competitiveness of enterprise Sample size 150 F 30,222*** Coefficient R2 0,455 Coefficien R2 have been adjusted 0,440 Durbin Watson 1,902 Notes: *** Meaning level <0.01; ** Significance level of <0.05; * Meaning level <0.10 (double-sided test); NS: Not significant - Not statistically significant Source: Calculated by author from survey data. - Correction coefficient R2 of 0.440: Thus, 40% of the change in the enterprise competitiveness is explained by independent variables of the model. - VIF are less than 10, so the regression model does not have multi-collinearity. The Durbin Watson coefficient (1< d = 1,902 < 3), thus, the regression model has no autocorrelation. - With significance level Sig. <0.05 of the F test, it can be concluded that the given model is 74 ,400 ,501 ,189 ,090 consistent with the actual data. In other words, the independent variables have a linear correlation with the dependent variable and with confidence level of 95%. - Columns ―Significant level‖ showed that all variables had statistical significance levels less than 0.05 except that F4 was not statistically significant. Thus, all factors from F1 to F3 have Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) - F33: Ability to give payments fully and, timely * The group M4: Machine and Technology - M41: Type, amount of machine - M42: Quality of machine and technology * The group R5: R & D Capacity - R51: Level of investment in research and development (R & D) of technology - R52: Budget for technological innovation * The group I6: Infrastructure - I61: Level of meeting requirement of Total area of production workshops - I62: Level of meeting requirement of Auxiliary systems (roads, electricity ware, supply and drainage of water) in the layout - I63: Level of meeting of requirement of Total area of the enterprise’s land for present activities and expansion in the future - I64: Level of meeting requirement of The system of administration houses and canteens, dwellings for workers a significant impact on the competitiveness of enterprises with confidence level of 95%. Model of the competitiveness of VTIS The tests confirm that the groups of factor that affect to the competitiveness of the furniture enterprises in Vietnam. They consist of 6 groups with 16 factors: * The group E1: Organization and Enterprise management - E11: Performance Efectiveness of the management system - E12: Structure capacity of personnel - E13: Leadership capacity of enterprise owner * The group L2: Labor qualification - L21: Rate of trained employees - L22: Skills of employee * The group F3: Finance position - F31: Size of capital of enterprise - F32: Ability to find a source of capital for production and business activities E1 E11 E12 L2 E13 L21 F3 L22 F31 F32 F33 Competitiveness of VFEs I61 I62 I63 M41 I6 M42 M4 Model 1. Model of the competitiveness of VTIS The Actual proposal model of competitivenss for VTIS 75 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) The present competitiveness of VFEs in term of the real groups of factors by Descriptive Statistics Table 7: Competitiveness of VFEs in term of the real groups of factors by Descriptive Statistics Avarage % (compare Degree of Standard value of to max. No Factor Variance competitiveDeviation The score - 5 eness cretiria points) 1 Ability of Organization and management (E1) 1.1 Performance Efectiveness of 2,97 0,51 0,71 59,40 Medium the management system (E11) 1.2 Structure capacity of personnel 3,31 0,42 0,65 66,20 High (E13) 1.3 Leadership capacity of 3,55 0,45 0,67 71,00 High enterprise owner (E14) 2 Employment qualification (L2) 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5 5.1 5.2 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Rate of trained employees (L21) Skills of employee (L23) Machine and technology (M3) Type, amount of machine (M31) Quality of machine and technology (M32) Finance Position (F4) Size of capital of enterprise (F41) Ability to find a source of capital for production and business activities (F42) Ability to give payments fully and, timely F43) R&D Capacity (R5) Level of investment in research and development (R & D) of technology (R51) Budget for technological innovation (R52) Infrastructure (I6) Level of meeting of requirement of Total area of the enterprise’s land for present activities and expansion in the future (I61) Level of meeting requirement of Total area of production workshops (I62) Level of meeting requirement of The system of administration houses and canteens, dwellings for workers (I63) Level of meeting requirement of Auxiliary systems (roads, electricity ware, supply and drainage of water) in the layout (I64) 2,71 0,34 0,58 54,20 Medium 3,00 0,44 0,67 60,00 Medium 3,62 0,40 0,63 72,40 High 2,53 0,43 0,65 50,60 Medium 2,86 0,81 0,90 57,20 Medium 3,34 0,60 0,78 66,80 High 3,76 0,51 0,71 75,20 High 0,45 0,60 1,30 0,42 0,54 26,07 Weak 2,97 0,74 0,86 59,40 Medium 3,00 0,68 0,83 60,00 Medium 1,59 0,51 0,72 31,80 Weak 3,22 0,52 0,72 64,40 High 1,29 25,87 Weak Source: Calculated by author from survey data. 76 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) No 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 Table 8: The Degree of present competitiveness of VFEs in the real afected criteria Factor General solution Group 1: Ability of Organization and management (E1) Performance Efectiveness of the management system Medium Structure capacity of personnel High Leadership capacity of enterprise owner High Skills of employee Medium Group 2: Finance Position (F6) Size of capital of enterprise Medium Ability to find a source of capital for production and business High activities Ability to give payments fully and, timely High Level of meeting requirement of Total area of production Medium workshops Level of meeting requirement of Auxiliary systems (roads, High electricity ware, supply and drainage of water) in the layout Type, amount of machine High Quality of machine and technology Medium Group 3: Infrastructure Level of meeting of requirement of Total area of the enterprise’s Medium land for present activities and expansion in the future Level of meeting requirement of The system of administration Weak houses and canteens, dwellings for workers Rate of trained employees Medium Source: Calculated by author from survey data. Analyzing expert opinion using SWOT method Table 9: Analyzing expert opinion using SWOT method And based on the results of the analysis of the present situation and the factors affecting to the competitiveness and competitiveness of the surveyed enterprises, some possible solutions to improve the competition of VTIS are as follows: - Improve the Ability of organization and management of enterprises and skills of employees. - Improve the finance position of the enterprise - Improve infrastructure and machinery for enterprise 4. Conclusions - The study has the following results: Contributed to the systematization of the competitive theory of enterprise, as well as 77 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) systematize and analyze the results of the researches related to the the thesis topic. Established a theoretical model of competitiveness of VTIS - Identified factors that affect to the competitiveness of VTIS as well as the interactions between them. - Indicated the current competitiveness of VTIS. - Established a realistic model of competitiveness of VTIS. - Proposed a scientific and practical plan to improve the competitiveness of VTIS. - Also need to focus to some points of the results of the study: - There are differences between proposal theoretical and practical models. - The actual model of competitiveness of VTIS is proved to be compatible and practical. - Solutions to improve the competitiveness of VTIS are practical and feasible. - Limitations of the study - The model only examines the impact of the group of internal factors on the competitiveness of VTIS without indicating the impact of external factors (eg, general policy as well as policies for furniture industry), market information, input materials supply, ..etc). - When studying the impact of the group of internal factors on the competitiveness of VTIS, some of the internal factors such as marketing capacity, cost, product distribution, sales activity, after-sales services, so on were not mentioned. - Ability to apply the results of this study in practical: It is possible to apply the model of the study by scoring the influencing factors to determine the competitiveness of the enterprise. - On the basis of solutions proposed by the study and the reality at the enterprise to develop a plan to improve the competitiveness of enterprise. - Further research recommendations for the competitiveness of VTIS: - Considering the impact of external factors: market information, input materials supply, etc.) to the competitiveness of VTIS. - Study the impact of other internal factors on the competitiveness of VTIS, such as marketing capacity, cost, product distribution, sales activity, after-sales services. Also, to be applied the researched model and proposed solutions to practices in order to improve it. REFERENCES [1]. A. He P. (2008). Competitiveness Capacity Enhancement of Exported Timber Industry. Commercial Paper, (23). [2]. Binh H.T. (1997). Solutions improving timber materials in Vietnam wood industry. University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City [3]. Doan Viet Dung. (2015). Theory of competitive structure with the enhancement of competitiveness of Vietnam commercial banks today. Hanoi National Economic University [4]. Le Thi Hang. (2013). Improving Competitiveness in Providing Mobile Communication Services of Vietnam Telecommunication Companies. PhD thesis. National Economics University, Hanoi. [5]. Pham Thu Huong. (2017). Competitiveness of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs). PhD. Thesis: Study on Area of Hanoi. [6]. Hong P.T (2004). Competitiveness Strategy for SMEs in Vietnam now. Hanoi: National Politics Published House. [7]. Nguyen Manh Hung. (2013). Enhancing the Competitiveness of Vietnam's Telecommunications Sector. PhD thesis. National Economics University, Hanoi. [8]. Lau, Ronald S. (1 January 2002). Competitive factors and their relative importance in the US electronics and computer industries. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (1): 125–135. [9]. Nguyen Thanh Long. (2016). Research on factors affecting competitiveness of Ben Tre tourism enterprises. PhD thesis. Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics. [10]. Passemard and Calantone (2000). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance by Michael E. Porter 1980, p. 18. [11]. Salinger, L. 1997. Comparative Advantage Analysis A Guide to Developing Agriculture Markets and Agro Enterprises. Pp 1-120, World bank. 78 Chuyên mục: Quản trị KD & Marketing - TẠP CHÍ KINH TẾ & QUẢN TRỊ KINH DOANH SỐ 06 (2018) [12]. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York. [13]. Powell, Thomas C. (1 September 2001). Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (9): 875–888. [14]. Report on Competitiveness of Vietnam. (2010). Central Institute for Economy Management - CIEM. [15]. R. Francois Husson, Sebastien Le, Jérôme Pagès. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using. CRC Press 2011 [16]. Thanh D.D. (2010). Competitiveness Capacity in the Global Intergrative Era. Youth Union Publisher, HCM City. [17]. The Global Competitiveness Report 2015 - 2016. [18].The Annual Global Competitiveness Report, 2015. [19]. Pham Thi Hong Yen, Hoang Xuan Hoa. (2016). The present status and proposing solution. Central Institute For Economy Management-CIEM. WB-Annual Business Report 2016. Thông tin tác giả: 1. Trần Việt Đức - Đơn vị công tác: Trường đại học Sư phạm Kỹ thuật Nam Định - Địa chỉ email: tranvietduc6903@gmail.com 2. Vũ Xuân Thôn - Đơn vị công tác: Ban quản lý các dự án lâm nghiệp – Bộ NN&PTNT 3. Nguyễn Phan Thiết - Đơn vị công tác: Trường đại học Lâm nghiệp Việt Nam Ngày nhận bài: 22/05/2018 Ngày nhận bản sửa: 25/06/2018 Ngày duyệt đ ng: 29/06/2018 79