« Home « Kết quả tìm kiếm

Autonomous Agents


Tóm tắt Xem thử

- Abstracting and non-profit use of the material is permitted with credit to the source.
- The output of the entire behavior hierarchy is calculated as follows:.
- 1999) and was a combination of the A LIGNMENT , C OHESION , and S EPARATION primitive tasks.
- Note that the goals of the A LIGNMENT.
- task, the addition of the G OAL S EEK complicated the F LOCKING task.
- Each is similar to the corresponding hierarchy for the F LOCKING -CA composite task with the addition of the G OAL S EEK primitive behavior.
- task policies must share control of the agent (Russell &.
- Note that this abstraction of the state only occurs in the composite behaviors;.
- In general, no one behavior is given complete control of the agent’s actions..
- The first metric used was the best generalized performance of the agent controllers..
- Four experimental runs for each of the ten folds were performed.
- of the angle, such as SMALL.
- Even with the use of the adaptive fuzzy behavior hierarchy, the significantly.
- This is due to the fact that, in modular reinforcement learning, all learning takes place in the policies of the primitive tasks.
- Steering behaviors for autonomous characters, Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, pp.
- The similar structure of the basis functions of Fig.
- The different structures of the basis functions of Fig.
- The eigenfunctions of the 8x8 grid world in Fig.
- The detail of the transfer method is shown in Fig.
- Map the values of the source value function to the values of the corresponding states in the target task..
- The topology of the task is the same as Fig.
- The accelerated effect of the transfer method in the scaling domain transfer 4.3 Topological Domain Transfer.
- 13(b) represents that the size of the door is increased..
- The performance of the transferred policies is shown in Fig.
- The accelerated effect of the transfer method is shown in Fig.
- The target tasks of the topological domain transfer.
- The accelerated effect of the transfer method in the topological domain transfer 4.4 Task Transfer.
- The performance of the transfer method is shown in Fig.
- The accelerated effect of the transferred method is shown in Fig.
- The source and target tasks of the task transfer.
- The performance of the transfer method in the task transfer.
- The accelerated effect of the transfer method in the task transfer 4.5 Synthetic Transfer.
- The accelerated effects of the transfer method are shown in Fig.
- The source task (a) and the target tasks (b) and (c) of the synthetic transfer.
- The accelerated effect of the transfer method in the synthetic transfer.
- The theoretical analysis of the simple transfer method is based on the spectral analysis on graph Laplacian.
- In other words, the evidence demonstrates the accelerated effect of the transfer method.
- Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning Workshop..
- Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence..
- Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning..
- Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Machine Learning..
- Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence..
- Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems..
- Most of the behaviors in soccer agent systems depend on the strategies to be performed..
- changing the angle at goal, increasing the force of the kick).
- The formulation of the problem is: Let A.
- It represents the individual information of the objects in the field, such as players and ball.
- The formation reveals part of the general strategy of a team.
- As in the real soccer game, the goalkeeper is not considered as part of the formation.
- Neighbor nodes of the same zone are linked.
- where N m is the number of nodes of the middle zone (Due to the lack of space the deduction of this formula is not described in this work).
- It is presented an analysis of the match between TsinguAeolus vs.
- Proceedings of the First European Workshop Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW-89) (eds.
- Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Cooperative Knowledge Based Systems (ed.
- Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Cooperating Knowledge Based Systems (ed.
- Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93).
- In Proceedings of the 7th international Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems - Volume 3 (Estoril, Portugal).
- Communications of the ACM 24 (6)..
- M ( 0 ) is the initial marking of the net..
- For instance, the initial marking of the Petri net from Fig.
- Note the usage of the predicate.
- T S is the set of transitions associated with successful impact of the action;.
- T F is the set of transitions associated with failure impact of the action;.
- The Action Coordinator layer contains Petri net models of the task plans.
- Petri net model of the Score_Goal task..
- As an example consider the boundedness of the net.
- 5 Prefix all added transitions with the name of the model;.
- Having set the initial marking of the net,.
- Table 1 gives a summary of the actions running-conditions and desired-effects.
- r.success (d) Separate view of the full communications model..
- Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications, Proceedings of the IEEE .
- One of the sequences is then selected according to a particular planning.
- strategy (A utility is used in the case of the decision-theoretic planning.
- In this figure, there are a number of hierarchical models of the room.
- These sequences are called refinements of the task..
- selects one of the SL plans to refine further.
- Often this restricts the quality of the resulting plan.
- This value is initially given as part of the SL model.
- our only concern is the cost of resolution and the quality of the resulting plan..
- It also lowers the performance of conflict estimations of the CPs.
- of the Sixth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 2005), LNAI 3620, pp.
- of the Fourth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 2001), LNAI 2080, pp.
- of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 94), pp.
- of the International Workshop on Networked Sensing Systems, pp.
- of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS95), pp.
- A host’s administrator can run an agent platform (i.e., an instance of the agent middleware) on his host.
- Without it, a platform administrator cannot guarantee the availability of the agent platform..
- Hosts on which an agent resides may be malicious, yet temporarily have complete control of the agent’s runtime environment.
- Protecting the integrity of the migration path of an agent 2.
- Protecting the integrity of the agent’s data and (binary) code 3.
- Ensuring confidentiality of the agent’s data.
- Ensuring integrity of the agent’s control flow.
- Unfortunately, both uses of the TPM require specialized hardware.
- To protect an agent’s code, the agent carries a signature from the agent owner over a hash of the agent’s code.
- Agent owners form the base of the trust mechanism.
- The most recently published information indicates the current location of the agent.
- Each host runs an instance of the AgentScape middleware.
- Threat analysis of the domain name system.
- In Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Principals of Programming (POPL).
- In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Middleware Security (MidSec)